An elderly gentleman recently spoke with me about a conversation that had remained with him long after a church service had ended.
That morning the pastor had spoken about the importance of Christian community. Growth in Christ, he said, is not meant to happen in isolation. God forms His people together. We learn from one another, encourage one another, bear one another's burdens, and mature together. Christianity is not a solitary pursuit.
The gentleman found himself agreeing wholeheartedly. In fact, he realized that this very conviction had led him to become part of that congregation. He firmly believed that Christians need one another.
Yet as he listened, another thought quietly surfaced. "Do I really belong here?"
He loved the people and appreciated the preaching. He valued the friendships he had begun to build. Yet years of personal Bible study had led him to conclusions that differed from several of the church's established doctrinal positions. He was neither argumentative nor intent on changing anyone's mind. He simply wondered whether there was still room for someone whose convictions had developed along a somewhat different path—and whether he was free to express those convictions honestly.
He did not want merely to sit in silence whenever his understanding differed. If genuine community involves learning from one another and growing together in Christ, could it also make room for sincere differences among people equally committed to following Scripture?
Perhaps that question points us toward two related but distinct ideas.
· Community asks, Who are we together?
· Belonging asks, Is there a place for me here?
The New Testament suggests that both questions matter. More importantly, it offers an answer that is far richer than we often imagine. One of the striking features of the New Testament is that it places far greater emphasis on unity of life than on uniformity of opinion.
Certainly the apostles insisted upon foundational truths. The lordship of Jesus Christ, His death and resurrection, the gospel itself—these were never presented as optional. Yet alongside those essential doctrines, the apostles repeatedly addressed churches whose members differed in maturity, background, understanding, and conviction.
Romans 14 provides one clear example. The disagreements there were not insignificant to those involved. They concerned sacred days and dietary practices rooted in deeply held religious convictions. Yet Paul's chief concern was not determining who won the argument. His concern was preserving fellowship while believers continued growing together in faith.
Likewise, in Ephesians 4 Paul urges believers first to "maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace." Only afterwards does he describe the church "growing up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ." Unity, then, is not presented as the reward for perfect agreement. Rather, it is the environment in which God matures His people.
Ironically, many Christians today search for the "right church" by looking for one where everyone appears to believe almost exactly the same things. Usually, those "same things" happen to be what the individual already believes.
The New Testament churches were nothing like that.
Corinth struggled with divisions, lawsuits, immorality, leadership disputes, the proper use of spiritual gifts, and even disagreement concerning the resurrection itself. Galatia wrestled with legalism. Rome brought together Jewish and Gentile believers whose cultures and convictions frequently collided. The churches of Asia Minor faced false teachers and internal conflict.
Yet remarkably, the apostles never suggested that complete agreement should become the prerequisite for fellowship. Instead, fellowship itself became one of God's principal means of producing maturity.
That observation has important implications.
Church history demonstrates that sincere, faithful Christians have disagreed over baptism, church government, spiritual gifts, the millennium, election and free will, the nature of hell, the Kingdom of God, the relationship between Israel and the Church, and the timing of Christ's return. If complete agreement on every secondary doctrine became the requirement for Christian fellowship, genuine community would become nearly impossible.
So..., perhaps we have been asking the wrong question.
That is a very different question.
It assumes that none of us has arrived.
It assumes that every believer still has something to learn.
It assumes that God has not only given us His Word but has also placed us within a body of fellow believers through whom He continues His work of teaching, correcting, encouraging, and refining us.
That image of the body is one Paul returns to repeatedly.
A healthy human body is a marvel of communication. Billions of cells continually exchange information. Nerves transmit signals almost instantaneously. Muscles respond. Organs coordinate their work. Every part depends upon every other part. Health is maintained through constant communication.
When communication breaks down, however, the body begins to suffer. Messages fail to reach their destination. Systems become isolated from one another. Sometimes the body's own cells begin working against one another. Disease is often the result of broken communication and damaged relationships within the body itself.
Paul's picture of the church is strikingly similar.
The body of Christ was never intended to consist of isolated individuals quietly occupying the same room once a week. It was created as a living organism whose members continually strengthen, encourage, correct, comfort, and instruct one another. If communication ceases—not merely conversation, but honest, loving, Christ-centered communication—the body cannot flourish as it was designed.
This does not mean that every opinion deserves equal weight, nor that truth is unimportant. Quite the opposite. The purpose of Christian community is not to avoid difficult conversations but to pursue truth together under the authority of Scripture.
Many years ago, while reading the work of psychiatrist M. Scott Peck, I encountered an observation that has remained with me ever since. In The Different Drum, Peck argued that what many people call "community" is often only the appearance of community. Genuine community, he suggested, is surprisingly rare because it requires people to move beyond superficial harmony into relationships marked by honesty, humility, and trust.
He described four stages through which many groups pass.
First comes pseudocommunity, where everyone is polite, differences remain hidden, and conflict is carefully avoided. It appears peaceful, but the peace is often maintained by silence rather than understanding.
Next comes chaos. Real differences begin to surface. People try to persuade, correct, or even control one another. Conversations become difficult because everyone is attempting to win rather than understand.
Only then, Peck argued, comes emptiness—the willingness to surrender the need always to be right, to protect one's image, or to control the outcome. Finally, genuine community begins to emerge. Trust develops. People become free to disagree honestly without threatening the relationship itself.
Whether one accepts every aspect of Peck's model is beside the point. His observations raise a searching question for the church. How many congregations remain in pseudocommunity?
Many appear peaceful because certain conversations never occur. Members quickly learn which questions are welcomed and which are better left unasked. Those whose understanding differs simply remain silent. Outwardly there is harmony, but beneath the surface there may be uncertainty, loneliness, or fear.
The New Testament paints a different picture.
Acts 15 records vigorous disagreement over Gentile believers.
Paul and Barnabas experienced such a sharp disagreement over John Mark that they eventually parted company.
The churches addressed throughout the New Testament were hardly free from conflict.
Yet the apostles consistently urged believers not to avoid disagreement but to work through it with humility, patience, gentleness, and love. "Speaking the truth in love" is very different from remaining silent in order to preserve appearances.
Peck also distinguished between an institution and a community.
Institutions naturally seek stability, organization, continuity, and consistency. They require leadership, policies, structures, and statements of belief. There is nothing inherently wrong with those things. In fact, they are often necessary.
Community, however, is about relationships. The two are not identical.
A church may become a highly efficient institution while never becoming a deeply connected community. Conversely, a genuine Christian community can exist even where organizational structures are relatively simple.
Ultimately, however, Christian community rests on a foundation much deeper than Peck described.
For Peck, community grows primarily through psychological and interpersonal processes. Scripture agrees that humility, honesty, patience, and vulnerability are essential. Yet it grounds them in something greater. Christian community exists because believers have already been united to Christ.
Paul's description of the church as the body of Christ is not merely a helpful illustration. It is a spiritual reality. We belong to one another because we first belong to Him. The Holy Spirit has already joined us together before we ever learn how to live together. That changes everything.
We are not creating community from nothing. We are learning to live consistently with the unity God has already established in Christ.
Perhaps this explains why Christian community is one of God's primary means of bringing us closer to the truth.
Left to ourselves, we all possess blind spots. We all read Scripture through the lens of our experiences, traditions, personalities, and assumptions. Sometimes another believer sees something we have overlooked. Sometimes our own conclusions are strengthened as they are tested by thoughtful questions. Sometimes we discover that convictions we held with great confidence require further refinement. At other times we find ourselves helping someone else see truths they had previously missed.
This is how the body grows. Not by demanding that every member already possess perfect understanding, but by encouraging every member to continue growing toward the Head, who is Christ.
Christian maturity, therefore, is measured not only by the doctrines we can defend but also by the humility with which we continue learning. We pursue truth with all our minds, but we pursue one another with all our hearts. Conviction and charity are not enemies. They are companions.
Perhaps that elderly gentleman asked the right question after all.
"Do I really belong here?"
"Are we becoming the kind of community where sincere followers of Christ can continue growing together?"
If the answer to that question is yes, then the church has become far more than an institution sharing common beliefs. It has become what God intended from the beginning—a living body, joined to Christ its Head, speaking the truth in love, growing together into maturity, and helping one another move ever closer to the truth He desires us all to know.
No comments:
Post a Comment